Is Comet Elenin a Brown Dwarf Star? –
An Exclusive Interview with Dr. Mensur Omerbashich
Yowusa.com, 01-June-2011
Marshall Masters
Contributors: Ed Douglas, Richard Goodwin and Terral
Croft of the Planet X Town Hall, Comet Elenin Research Team
Page 1 of 2
 A vocal minority view holds that Comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin), is a brown dwarf star in a long
elliptical orbit around our Sun.
Whatever this object may be, it is
now inbound from beyond the orbit of Mars. Astronomers are following its course into the core of our system. They
maintain that it is a relatively young comet, which then begs the question ̶̶ when is a comet not a comet?
In contrast to that question, Elenin brown dwarf proponents often
cite a paper written by Dr. Mensur Omerbashich that is available
through the Cornell University Library. What makes this paper so
useful is that it connects seismic events like the recent earthquake
in Japan, to celestial alignments involving Comet Ellen.
Cornell University Library, 11-Apr-2011
arXiv:1104.2036v1 [physics.gen-ph]
Astronomical alignments as the cause of
~M6+ seismicity
I here demonstrate empirically my
georesonator concept in which tidally induced magnification of Earth
masses' resonance causes seismicity. ...I used the comet C/2010 X1
(Elenin), as it has been adding to robustness in terms of very strong
seismicity since 2007 (in terms of strongest seismicity: since 1965).
The Elenin will continue intensifying the Earth's very strong
seismicity until August-October, 2011. Approximate forecast of
earthquakes based on my discoveries is feasible.
Original PDF – Yowusa.com Subscriber
Download
Dr. Omerbashich's paper presents what
he sees as a cause-and-effect relationship between recent seismicity
on earth and the approach of Comet Elenin, that goes back decades.
However, His paper does not suggest, nor present the possibility that
it is a smaller, unborn binary twin to our own Sun, so we contacted
him to request a written interview, and he accepted.
All three members of the Goodwin of the
Comet Elenin Research Team, Ed Douglas, Richard Goodwin and Terral
Croft discussed Dr. Omerbashich's interview and the actual list of
questions presented to him were penned by Marshall Masters and
Richard Goodwin. The goal of the question set was threefold:
- Clarify the cause-and-effect
relationship between Comet Elenin and recent major earthquakes.
- Vet the author's background in
response to issues raised by Ed Douglas of the team.
- Test for support of the Comet Elenin
brown dwarf star theory advocated by Terral Croft.
As per our agreement with Dr.
Omerbashich, our questions, along with his answers, are presented
as-is and without editing or modification. Following this interview
segment, Marshall will present his findings on the question: is Comet
Elenin a brown dwarf star, and if not, then what is it?
Yowusa.com Exclusive Interview
with
Dr. Mensur Omerbashich
Questions submitted by Marshall Masters and Richard Goodwin on May 25, 2011,
Answered by Dr. Omerbashich on May 28, 2011
1. In your paper, ASTRONOMICAL
ALIGNMENTS AS THE CAUSE OF ~M6+ SEISMICITY, you present Comet C/2010
X1 (Elenin) as a georesonator causality for an increased pattern of
major earthquakes, all across the planet. What is a georesonator and
how does this apply to Elenin?
A forced mechanical oscillator is akin
to soldiers step-marching across a bridge. The bridge eventually
collapses when the critical resonance magnification is reached
matching the grave period of oscillation of the bridge. Georesonator
is one such concept in which the whole Earth is thought of as a
closed mechanical oscillator forced externally by celestial bodies.
As I showed back in 2003, Earth gravity
responds strongly to alignments with the Moon and the Sun. Such
alignments disturb Earth masses systematically and measurably so much
so that magnification of mechanical resonance gets set off. I now
tested the concept empirically, by using all celestial bodies in our
solar system’s "plane". I was thus able to
demonstrate that most bodies (when aligned in a specific fashion; for
longer than around three days; etc.) are also capable of setting off
the resonance magnification, thus causing earthquakes.
Basically, the impact of resonance
magnification on the mantle, which makes most of the Earth’s
mass, gives rise to tectonics and, separately, to strong (~M6+)
earthquakes as well. The inclusion of the Elenin to improve the
robustness of the empirical test was justified by the fact that
geophysics community is still clueless as to the source of most of
the energy supplied to the Earth and required for tectonogenesis i.e.
moving of the mantle/plates, as well as for causing strong
earthquakes.
The georesonator and its
generalization, called the hyperresonator, account for that
universally, i.e., regardless of what heavenly object one is talking
about. For example, if we know that volcanoes on Earth erupt with
burning-hot lava, but on Titan they spew ice-cold ammonia, the cause
of volcanic or, generally, mantle dynamics on Earth cannot lie in
thermo-nuclear reactions and processes, but is essentially
mechanical.
An important facet of the georesonator
is that it explains why the Pacific Rim and Mediterranean regions are
such tremendous shakers: naturally on the georesonator, largest
bodies of water (actually: the absences of land mass needed to
conduct vibration) act as virtual attenuators of excess vibration.
Thus the largest bodies of water on Earth, namely the Pacific-Indian
Oceans system and the Atlantic Ocean-Mediterranean Sea system, are
likeliest places for strongest seismicity to occur on the
georesonator.
This means that most of the
mechanically induced seismicity gets shaken off the georesonator by
exactly those regions, respectively, as the vibration basically
arriving from all directions ends up locked up within the largest
landless rims first. For very strong seismicity (M8+), which occurs
during multiple very long alignments, this division gets blurred, so
that even inland regions become prone too.
2. What was it that first drew
your attention to Elenin and has incorporated this object into your
research? Has it compelled you to revisit any of your previous
theories?
The Elenin was suitable for testing of
my concept because its trajectory, with inclination of around 1º,
is virtually coplanar to our solar system. It also approaches the Sun
relatively slowly, traveling along the legs of a hyperbola. These
characteristics are enabling long alignments amongst the Elenin, the
Earth and a third body.
The Elenin also drags gravitationally
locked particles spanning 30k+ km, but neither its relatively small
mass nor relatively low density constitute forbidding factors for
causing strong earthquakes in the georesonator. No other object with
similar properties has been noticed in our solar system in the past
few decades, to the best of my knowledge.
In fact, I estimate that objects with
as coincidental such characteristics as the Elenin’s can appear
at most twice per century. This made the passage of the Elenin a
unique opportunity for testing my concepts empirically as robustly as
possible, given that instrumental records of earthquakes span barely
one century too. So there is no reason why the Elenin would make me
revisit my concepts as its behavior has been in excellent agreement
with them.
3. Your georesonator concept, as
applied to the Elenin, is based on your hyperresonator equations.
What inspired you to first conceive your hyperresonator equations?
Clearly, the georesonator was just a
special case, as it applied to a specific set of closed mechanical
oscillators. I wanted to see if generalizing the concept to the
absolute realm would have a physical meaning too. So I developed
absolute generalization in 2006 and 2008, and called it the
hyperresonator.
In it, every object regardless of its
location or time is perfectly tuned with every other object. Thus no
time or location must have a role in the hyperresonator equations,
especially if we know that space, time, and space-time are all just
imaginary concepts without any physical meaning whatsoever, unless
such meanings are declared by convention (postulated within
theories).
Indeed, as I have found, there exists
an exact physical-mathematical relationship, thereby a unique
physical meaning as well, linking object’s grave period and its
orbiter’s orbital period, with c, G and e, at a given scale.
This means that the grave period of oscillation (that each object
naturally possesses) is not a random number, as previously believed.
The hyperresonator equations are the
first analytical expressions for actually computing the value of a
physical constant, the values of which are normally determined
experimentally. This also proves that G is not a constant but simply
a coefficient, as others have long suspected. Finally, what the
orbital-oscillatory equations of the hyperresonator are basically
saying is that a gravity field is simply a state of aether’s
vibration.
4. Your hyperresonator equations
also challenge the validity of Einstein's General Relativity theory
and Planck's Quantum Physics. As a former geologist for the Berkeley
National Laboratory in California and the Geophysics Institute of
Hungary in Budapest, how have your peers responded to your
hyperresonator equations?
Hyperresonator equations do not simply
challenge, but immediately invalidate both Einstein's General
Relativity and Planck's Quantum Physics theory as fundamentally
flawed. Newton’s assumption on constancy of G, and the faked
"physical units" he attached thereupon to G only in order
to close his theory physically as well as mathematically, have made
his theory obviously flawed to begin with.
By accepting this fundamental flaw,
Einstein made his own theory of general relativity a mere alternative
(Riemannian-geometry) description of the Newton’s theory.
Adding a new member into the Newton’s equation in order to
account for higher order terms has not changed the elementary flaw,
as Einstein never altered G. There are no physical units in the
hyperresonator equations – just proportions and scales, that
is, all quantities are either unitless, or they carry derived units
only. And, as I already mentioned, there is no explicit dependency on
time or space or time-space, meaning the equations describe a
fundamental principle.
As for quantum physics being disproved
by the hyperresonator, take for example the entanglement, the
non-locality, and other "strange phenomena". They now all
turn out to be simply consequences of the fact that
georesonator-determined rules for orbiting and oscillating of
everything on Earth do naturally provide the settings for all quantum
experiments to trivially "work" – even at a distance,
but which still is only a terrestrial distance completely defined by
the georesonator.
Here a distance is a geodesic on the
georesonator and not just on a "body of that-and-that mass and
density" any more, which was a simplistic view. Thus quantum
physics will most certainly exhibit same phenomena differently from a
solar system to a solar system; or, from a celestial body to a
celestial body. Worth noticing here is the failure of all experiments
aimed at accurately determining the value of G, which continues to
this day so that G is the most poorly resolved of all official
constants.
Upset by this, Einstein once remarked
that, if any field of research had a potential to invalidate his
theory, then it will surely be geophysics. Evidently now, such a low
accuracy of G-experiments is due to previously uncounted-for
georesonator, a circumstance which, while providing settings for fake
"quantum physics" to apparently work, at the same time
thwarts real mechanist physics from producing best possible results.
Curiously, Einstein never believed
quantum physics was real either, distrusting its immense reliance on
something as vague as statistics. As for the second part of your
question, I never discussed the hyperresonator as there is no point
in discussing a theoretically demonstrated concept other than noting
that the derived equations are correct.
Besides notifying the NIST of my
discovery, I also submitted it to Annalen der Physik journal, which
published Einstein’s relativity papers, as it should be normal
for a journal that published a theory to also publish that theory’s
disproof.
But after the initial review by Editor,
Professor Hehl, who exclaimed "So it was that simple!", he
came back saying he was facing opposition to publish it. Some years
later, I found out that it was probably a Stanford physicist and an
active Zionist who keenly objected my equations. Just how smart it is
to object an equation (where two sides must be equal, hence the
name), I leave it to your readers to judge for themselves.
To illustrate the rigidity of the game
they played though, his official reasoning was that a mechanist was
not allowed to use a thought experiment (of marching soldiers) unlike
relativists (Einstein’s elevator) or quantum physicists
(Schrödinger’s cat).
Reviewers need not be witty or honest
these days; some are willing to go as far as ridiculing equations
while hiding behind anonymity, meaning they will even resort to
argumentum ad verecundiam just to achieve some behind-the-scenes
agenda. I still consider that paper submitted and I am waiting for
Annalen der Physik to publish it with due apology.
I tried hard to understand the psyche
of people in the particle physics community who want to explain one
magical concept of gravity by looking for the "God’s
particle". I can imagine how powerful it must feel when
thousands of minds get high on trillions in taxpayers’ funds,
and then all of the sudden a fellow comes in who instead finds a
"God’s tune" – immediately linking the Kepler’s
laws to all of gravity theories ever contemplated, while by the very
nature of his discovery, making also all those trillions essentially
misspent.
5. The Electric Universe theory
is very popular on the Web and puts forward the concept that there is
electricity throughout the Universe and that bodies in space have
electrical interactions as well. How does your georesonator compare
with the Electric Universe theory in terms of Comet Elenin and could
there be any correlations?
I am not familiar with the details of
that theory. Bear in mind though, that electromagnetism can also be
a byproduct and a feature of a closed mechanical oscillator.
6. Many are concerned with the
ongoing changes in the Comet Elenin's orbit and some have speculated
that it is "under intelligent control." Have you found any
evidence whatsoever to corroborate this intelligent control theory
and if not, what do you believe accounts for these orbital changes?
I was not concerned with such changes,
be them real or not. I used the Elenin’s latest trajectory
solutions. All I can say is that the Elenin has been behaving as
postulated by my concepts, just as all planets in our solar system
do.
There is one exception which confirms
the rule, as they say. It is the Mars, which I showed is unable of
causing strong seismicity. Its influence via alignments is in terms
of weaker seismicity only. This can be seen from the latest long
alignment Earth-Venus-Mars of 22-25 May, which resulted only in a
significant increase of M5-M6 but not ~M6+ earthquakes.
7. You mention 'Gravitational
Shadowing' throughout your research paper. Could you explain what is
meant by that term and how it applies to the discussion of Comet
Elenin?
Gravitational shadowing is explained
and illustrated in my 2008 paper titled ‘Scale Invariability’
(http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0876). Recall that Newton saw gravity as
an unexplainable "attraction between mass objects acting upon
each other at distance". Scientists nowadays would call it a
paranormal phenomenon and most certainly would stay away from it.
Somehow though, here we are centuries
later, still stuck with it as the pillar of all science. Newton’s
biographers have noted though that he has built such a view based on
his obsession with the occult and the alchemy, pure and simple.
Namely, in such a view, there is nothing in between the bodies, and
the entire action of supposed attraction occurs supposedly through
the void.
So in the end, as math never lies, his
attraction equation ended up having a minus sign he could not
explain. No one else could either, and the sign is by now normally
omitted from all uses. But what the minus sign really indicates is
that gravity is not attractive, as Newton would surmise and Einstein
subsequently adopted, but repulsive instead.
So, I asked myself: what if gravity is
actually a mechanical vibration along the masterfully tuned aether
(also known as fabric of Space, vacuum energy, etc.), coming from all
directions simultaneously to the observed body? Such a generalization
turned out fruitful indeed, as I was able to derive my hyperresonator
equations demonstrating that an oscillating-orbiting system is not
structured in an arbitrary fashion but is instead tuned, from scale
to scale.
It’s like a God’s symphony
if you like; heavenly waves enveloped in harmony, from octave to
octave. The fabric of Space is thus tuned in a most masterful way of
all: the coefficient of proportionality, G, is what we all remember
from elementary school geometry and biology as the most essential
base of all, e, at a prescribed scale.
Recall also that there are many natural
or mathematical relationships which line up with e. so G turns out to
be no exception either. Thus the gravitational shadow can be viewed
as that obstruction to gravity vibration, which is caused by one body
to another, thus masking the aether’s forward-propagation of
mechanical vibration from everywhere to the body of interest. In
other words, I abandoned what was probably the last geocentric view
in history of science, and took a more logical view – that of
omnipresence rather than local appearance favored traditionally.
Therefore the gravitational shadow is a
new measure of gravity, which complements or replaces the concept of
mass, depending how you look at it. Thus a gravitational shadow is
the factor which is at least as relevant in the alignments-triggered
resonance magnification as any of the Newtonian parameters: mass,
density, or distance (the latter in so far as it concerns the
object’s relative size i.e. its gravitational shadow only –
without considering the object’s mass).
8. You are a direct descendant of
Viceroy Boril Boric (1153-1165), a Black Knight Templar and Bosnia’s
first ruler. Have your ancient family connections to secret societies
been an influence in your work?
Black Knight Templar Viceroy Boritch
was the common direct ancestor to all Bosnian kings and bans, or the
founding father if you like. His recently uncovered coat of arms
along with other information indicate that he could be the deposed
rightful King of Britain, Count Eustace IV, who went on missing in
1153. A year later, we have a founder of a new State at the Drina
River (border between Roman Empires; today Bosnia-Serbia), surfacing
out of the blue and bearing only a viceroyalty title yet wearing
royal insignia…
Interestingly, an eminent British
archeologist has recently claimed that King Arthur was actually a
Croatian Knight whom he somehow linked to our own lineage. To
complete the story: the Omerbashichs are matrilineally-directly the
lineage of former Nemanichs too, who come from Knight Templar (and
Boric’s brother-in-arms, and son-in-law) Stefan Nemanja, the
founder of Serbia.
Note the etymology of our surname:
Omer+Basha, which is Semitic for Firstborn King, in the meaning of
dynasty founder. Namely, the Ottomans conquered Bosnia in early 16th
century, while committing horrific crimes including regicides of
kings and even child-heirs. My ancestor Duke Stjepan Berislavic, who
was also a cousin of a Croatia’s ruler, after valiantly leading
the resistance for decades in the north and to the west, got
slaughtered for refusing to convert to Islam.
His execution was ordered by the
Sultan’s grandson Husref, who administered Bosnia. After it
became obvious that the Ottoman power was overwhelming, Duke’s
heirs converted in order to preserve the bloodline. Since military
leadership was the tradition in our lineage, they were in return
granted the highest military posts in the Ottoman army. (To this day,
we have never occupied a civilian authority post though.)
Instead, the Sultan’s grandson
placed civilian government in the hands of Sephardic Jews who were
brought in from Spain and Portugal thanks to Pope Borgia (a bloodline
of Spanish Jews who posed as Catholics). The Sultan’s grandson
then founded Sarajevo for his new Jewish elite that took Islam in
return for their new status of usurping nobility, along with the
usurped land of our most noble ancestors.
The few thousand families of this elite
rules Bosnia to this day, and are easily recognized by their
surnames’ suffixes of “begovic” and similar. Their
treacherous character is best seen in occasional service that they
provide to the English geostrategic interests, while maintaining
Bosnia a coo-coo place where "logic does not apply and justice
does not rule". (As recently as last month, they committed a
real silent putsch, by which they maintain the ludicrous state of
affairs in Bosnia; perhaps making it again a catalyst of a World War,
just like in 1914).
Namely, being virtually in the Pope’s
backyard, Bosnia is of London’s utmost interest but only in a
state of permanent instability. England’s atrocities towards
Catholics are horrendous and always sneaky, beginning with the
Richard the Lion Heart’s sabotaging of the Crusades, then with
the Order of the Dragon sponsoring the Ottomans’ conquest of
Rome, and finally with Elisabeth I and her mental army of quislings
a.k.a. the Freemasonry that continues fighting her unholy war to this
day ever since she vowed the old continent would never again supply
able men to the Papal armies (used normally to try civilizing the
Anglo-Saxons)… (Continue to next page...)
|
