YOWUSA.COM Home Page  

The Kolbrin Bible: Glenn Kimball Special Edition

Win-Win Survival Handbook

Radio Free Earth

Feel Better on Your Own

Home Page  | Subscribe  |  Archive: 2000 - 2012   Cut to the Chase Radio  |  Planet X Town Hall
Earth  |  eBooks  |  ET  |  Humanity  |  Nostradamus  |  Planet X  |  SciTech  |  SCP  |  Space  |  War



Star Panel Fabrications in Popular Sky Programs

Yowusa.com, 11-Nov-2009
Marshall Masters, Author & Image Analysis
Jacco van der Worp, MSc, Star Panel Research

Page 1 of 2

Star Panel Fabrications in When people are looking for proof of the existence of Planet X, one of the first places they go looking is one of the popular sky programs, such as Google Sky and Microsoft WorldWide Telescope.

While these are incredibly useful tools for the common man to learn about astronomy, in terms of research they've only proven to be a source of targeted image fabrications.

Granted, one instance is a fluke, and twice is coincidence, but this has become a wide reaching, well-coordinated pattern of fabrication that is anticipatory and topically oriented. The goal of these fabrications is very simple. It is to take people down fruitless rabbit holes, so that they will lose interest in the topic.

Further to that is the new NASA mantra of "we would have seen it by now" which completely sidesteps the need to say something more meaningful, such as "we would have reported by now." There is a huge difference here between knowing something and sharing it with others.

Newbies who seek smoking-gun proof often proceed on the assumption that agencies such as NASA have a blemish-free history of honesty and total transparency. If that were the case, why are so many notable NASA Astronauts telling us that UFOs are real, contrary to NASA's position on the matter?

If you believe our space heroes, NASA is holding back on one of the biggest life-changing topics imaginable. This begs a logical question. If NASA is going to be less than honest about UFOs, why should we presume they would treat the topic of Planet X any differently?

Patrons who have been following Planet X research for some time, already know how this game is played. However, newbies are hesitant to challenge the authority of NASA, for fear of being mocked and humiliated, so they quietly turn to popular sky programs with the aim to find "the proof" just lying there before them.

It is a reminiscent of a time when European immigrants arrived at Ellis Island thinking their fortunes were in hand. All they needed to do was to pry loose, a few of the gold paving bricks everyone in the old country said were certainly to found in America. With those golden bricks in hand, they'd set for life. However, what they found was a completely differently reality, but not one entirely absent of new opportunities.

To you patrons who have been following this topic for some time, heads up. This article documents another assault on the newbies with new and devious fabrications. Frankly, it is one of the most sophisticated patterns of fabrication we've seen to date.

Mikh's Letter

Days after we released our video briefing titled Planet X Special Report No. 01: Where is Planet X?, we received the following e-mail from Mikh Modest, a yowusa.com patron in Germany.

Mikh Modest, October 28, 2009
eMail to Yowusa.com

Dear YOWUSA-Team / Dear Mr Masters,

I have a Question concerning your recently published PLANET X SPECIAL REPORT NO 1, which I hope you can send me a short answer to it soon:

In the report, you say that Planet X is currently approaching the inner solar system through the constellation of PICTOR.

What I don't understand is, if this is the case, then WHY has GOOGLE SKY and MICROSOFT censored the alleged position of Planet X in the constellation of ORION?

These are two VERY different places in the sky and Planet X CANNOT be seen in BOTH of them.

I used Google Earth / Sky myself to see the blacked out area beneath Orion, a topic which was touched on the Yowusa.com website some time ago.

BUT THEN, BY USING YOUR INFORMATION OUT OF THE PLANET X SPECIAL REPORT NO 1, I looked up Planet X's trajectory as you showed it in the report, and I found ANOTHER AREA THAT >COULD< HAVE BEEN CENSORED.

The coordinates in Google Sky:

LATITUDE: -42.555447°
LONGITUDE: -125.513189°
(RA 3h37min51.72s Dec -42°32'16.78")

Taking into account that the star map pictures were shot in 2007, this COULD very well be where Planet X was back then according to your trajectory in the Special Report No 1.

Thank you very much in Advance,
yours sincerely
Mikh Modest

We were impressed with Mikh's level of detail, although we have been dubious about the veracity of popular sky programs since we first began reporting on these star panel fabrications back in June of last year.

YOWUSA.COM, 29-June-2008
The Missing Orion Panel Mystery — What is Google and Microsoft Hiding From Us?

The Missing Orion Panel Mystery — What is Google and Microsoft Hiding From Us?We've received numerous emails from yowusa.com subscribers and visitors about a redacted area of space on both Google Sky and Microsoft Telescope. We've been following this and thanks to a new YouTube video by NoStarPanel, there is smoking gun proof of a massive cover up.

The area in question is located in the Southern part of the Constellation of Orion, below the ecliptic (the plane) of the solar system. An area of space that has long been of interest to Planet X / Nibiru researchers.

As a result of covering this particular sky panel in Orion, the only thing we became convinced of was that there was a fabrication. The purpose of this fabrication as we reported in our video briefing Planet X Special Report No. 01: Where is Planet X?, was to draw the attention of newbies along the ecliptic and out to the edge of the system, with useless fabrications so as to exhaust their attention.

As we reported in our first Planet X Special Report, serious researchers never gravitated towards these fabrications, other than to report them as we did. However as a result of Mikh's letter, we have found an entirely new kind of star panel, photo manipulation fabrication.

Interestingly enough, these fabrications appear to be to be coincidently based upon the estimated planet X trajectory presented in our book Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide.

It is noteworthy that we found three fabrications on one star panel dating back to 2006, which references 1999, 2001 and 2007. Each of these appears within 1° to 2° of our estimated trajectory for planet X spanning a period of some eight years, and all are found in a single panel dated 2006.

That fact alone prevents these fabrications from going beyond a simple smell test. However, newbies to the topic, who are searching for proof as opposed to information, are quite gullible to such tactics. With this in mind, we will now present our image analysis of these three fabrications, plus a fourth week called the Cube.

What We Found

While we were deciding what to do about Nikh's letter, we also received other e-mails with links to YouTube videos, and questions on the same topics. Since Nikh's letter placed this fabrication on or near our estimated trajectory for Planet X, we were curious to see if we could find any more.

Jacco van der Worp took the lead on the research. His goal was to find two or more fabrications on or somewhere near our estimated trajectory for planet X. He would then send to me the suspect images, and I would perform the image analysis.

When we started this, I felt it would take Jacco a week or two, but the following day, he came back to me with four fabrication suspects. After examining all four, I determined that all four evidenced photo manipulation. This were not natural aberrations or incidental database errors.

Skymap with 4 Fabrications

Please note, Jacco plotted his analysis using Starry Night Pro, Version: 6.0.0. The viewing point is from Earth: Lat 0 Long 0 (equator due south of London). The co-ordinates are noted in J2000, and the the source for panel fabrications is Google Sky (part of Google Earth).

We want to begin our analysis with the Cube as we call it, since it is not on our estimated trajectory for Planet X, but is indicative of the kind of fabrication one would expect to see.

The Cube (-5h01m48.24s -

We call this particular fabrication the cube because it reminds us of the Borg, cube-shaped spaceship we all saw in the Star Trek The Next Generation television series.

Like the fabrications we reported with The Missing Orion Panel Mystery — What is Google and Microsoft Hiding From Us?, the Cube is arguably designed to catch one's attention. A hook, if you will, for newbies searching for Planet X proof, via an unpopular sky program.

Assuming this star panel dated 2006 was mysteriously updated in 2009, this fabrication almost 10° away from where Planet X would have been in about mid-August of this year.

The Cube (-5h01m48.24s - 1 of 3

The Cube (-5h01m48.24s - 2 of 3

The Cube (-5h01m48.24s - 3 of 3

The important thing to note with this fabrication is how this very dense overlay patch fits neatly within the star field. But your eyes follow around the edges to see the relationship of the patch to its adjacent stars. With that, we move on to position one of three.

Position 1 — 1999 (-2h59m30.94s -

Position one is found at a point where planet X. What is immediately striking about this fabrication, is that like the Cube above, it fits within the adjacent stars surrounding it. It is located approximately 6° above where Planet X would have been in 1999, assuming this were not a star panel dated 2006.

Position 1 — 1999 (-2h59m30.94s - 1 of 3

Position 1 — 1999 (-2h59m30.94s - 2 of 3

Position 1 — 1999 (-2h59m30.94s - 3 of 3

The year 1999 was a important one for me and the yowusa.com co-founders.

In that year, I published my first major article in August with my analysis of the COMET C/1999 H1 (Lee) imagery as described in my Nostradamus — King of Terror analysis.

It was also the year I joined with Jacco van der Worp, Janice Manning and others, to launch Yowusa.com, and we first went live in December of that year. A most interesting year indeed, as was 2001. Continue to next page...

[1] [2]