All
good religions have their doctrines concerning the afterlife and
The Kolbrin Bible is no exception. Whilst the Bible and
many western religions teach of a physical resurrection, The
Kolbrin is more akin to eastern beliefs and enlightens us to
the nature of our immortal soul. The Kolbrin specifically
defines the hierarchical nature of the soul and spirit, the manifestations
of the aura, and explains what we can do to awaken our own soul
in this lifetime. Most importantly, it describes the true
nature of the afterlife and what will happen to our soul after the
final judgment.
Origins
of the Afterlife
Our ancestors fought
hard to survive and their life expectancy was
extremely low. The
majority often died from a food hunt gone wrong, sickness, or as a result of
inter-tribal wars as each tribe struggled to sustain
their own place within a growing society. The
curiosity surrounding the concept of life after
death as well as the existence of a soul can be
traced back to such times when the first
self-reflecting intelligent humans encountered
death. Comparing the nature of a dead body
with the apparent lifelessness of the sleeping body
would have caused great confusion amongst the
earliest of primitive humans. The dreamy
nature of sleep would have also been contemplated as
their archaic cognitive processes attempted to piece
together the mysteries of sleep and death.
It was eventually
noticed that during sleep, the dream world seemed as
real as being awake, and that it was even possible
to wake up and remember the journeys of the night in
great detail. However, even though the body had the
same appearance at death, the person would not wake
up to tell the amazing stories of their journey. It
is through such observations that early humans
eventually derived the notion of a soul which
experienced the dream world and lived on after
death.
Whilst many people
might be happy to dismiss the whole idea of the
existence of the soul simply because the inventive
logic came from early humans, it is interesting to
note that modern science has been unable to disprove
such beliefs, and in fact has even started to give
weight to such claims. The lives of our ancestors
revolved completely around spiritual beliefs and
they relied heavily on their gods to help them with
every aspect of their lives, right down to their
very survival.
When compared with
our ancestors, our modern lives are somewhat
protected from the true reality and nature of
death. Our family sizes are much smaller than that
of our ancestral tribes and therefore we do not
experience great frequencies of death. We are also
living longer than our ancestors and therefore do
not generally experience the deaths of our relatives
until we are at a more mature age. This means we
are usually capable of processing the events in the
ways we have been taught by our society.
At the expense of
spiritual growth and intimacy with the nature of
death, the quality of our modern lifestyle today has
improved tremendously. We now spend our days
working and living amongst the structural strength
and dependability of steel and concrete, instead of
amongst the dangers and unpredictability of the vast
savannas and wild jungles. We pay with cash or
credit at our convenience stores for food gathered
from shelves, instead of risking our very lives in a
dangerous hunt for a single nights’ meal for the
family.
Since our societies
are so sheltered from death and the entire
experience that is associated with it, is the
general layperson, uneducated in the worlds
religions, really in a suitable position to judge
the ancient religious beliefs or even capable of
choosing a religion? Most people are generally born
into a religion and either choose to adopt that
particular faith as a matter of convenience or
because through their experience with it, find it
fulfilling enough to search no further. Some people
grow frustrated with the beliefs imposed by their
religious parents and abandon religion altogether.
Few are given the unique opportunity by their
parents to decide which religion, if any, is best
for them when they reach the age to make an educated
decision for themselves.
The Vatican and Religious Research
The wisest of
decisions can only be made when a substantial amount
of relevant knowledge has been obtained and
understood. It is irresponsible to make imperative
decisions based on ignorance, convenience or
frustration. Many western organized religions will
argue against such reasoning because it threatens
their very existence. The best place to start
getting educated on religion is obviously the
internet. The Vatican has gone so far as to liken
the experience of researching religion on the
internet as “near-narcotic” and has even recommended
that the United Nations should get involved to stop
such religious education.
Reuters,
28 February, 2002
Vatican Warns of Dangers of
Cyberspace Faith
"Some visitors to
religious Web sites may be on a sort of shopping
spree, picking and choosing elements of customized
religious packages
to suit their
personal tastes," one of the documents said.
Describing the giddy
range of experiences offered online, it compared the
Internet to a mind-altering substance with
"near-narcotic effects." Priests should seek to
untangle people from virtual communities to real
belonging, it advised.
The United Nations,
the document recommended, should act as a watchdog
to protect the dignity of online readers.
Western religions
generally expect people to adopt the beliefs of the
church on a simple matter of “faith.” Perhaps they
are concerned that the people who are doing their
own research will find other, better alternatives
which in turn will cause an overall loss of power
for the churches. Perhaps they are also concerned
that people may even discover the true history of
religion and realize the hereditary nature of them
all, and therein find the true nature and source of
our spirituality.
In stark contrast to
these organized western traditions are the eastern
beliefs such as, for example, Hinduism. This
religion does not condemn other religions as wrong
or deceiving and they instead believe that they are
all paths up the same mountain leading to the same
God. Hindus are taught to study other religions in
order to develop their own understanding and
beliefs. They have no concept of the evil forces
that oppose God as it is known in western
religions. Instead they see evil as ignorance,
which they equate to the soul not being reflected
well in the mind, and this can be overcome through
seeking wisdom and meditative introspection.
These two polarized
examples between eastern and western belief systems
highlight the diversity of approaches towards
religious understanding available throughout the
world. While there are many differences, there are
also many similarities, and it is through the
knowledge of these similarities that coherent wisdom
can be obtained of the fundamental religious
truths. For the individual religious person, the
most fundamental truths which need to be understood
are those of death and the nature of the soul.
Biblical Confusion
Early Christian
thoughts were influenced by both Greek and Hebraic
traditions, and to this day it has resulted in
continued confusion when it comes to understanding
the nature of the soul. The Greek traditions teach
of the soul belonging to a spiritual realm quite
distinct from that of the tainted physical body
which it temporarily inhabits. Whereas Hebraic
traditions believe in a unity where there is no
contrast between body and soul. While the Greeks
believed in the eternal soul, the Hebrews believed
in a resurrection.
The concept of the
immortal soul as taught by the Greeks is limited to
only a few references within the Bible. Where it is
used, the confusion with Hebraic beliefs of the
body’s physical resurrection is obvious.
1 Corinthians,
15:52
For the trumpet will
sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we
will be changed.
The Bible states
that as part of our resurrection we will be given a
new imperishable body. This body is still believed
to be of a similar physical nature to our current
body, yet somehow better enough to survive the wear
and tear of eternity. However, there is no direct
mention of a soul in this sentence. The passage
then immediately continues on with statements
indirectly referring to souls, but taken out of
context in a confusing attempt to justify the
doctrines of resurrection.
1 Corinthians,
15:53-54
For the perishable
must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the
mortal with immortality. When the perishable has
been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal
with immortality, then the saying that is written
will come true: "Death has been swallowed up in
victory."
Assuming that we do
get resurrected and are given a new imperishable
body to clothe ourselves, what is actually contained
within this immortal body? According to the Bible
it is something mortal and perishable. Are they
implying that our old decaying skeleton will remain
under this fancy new suit? No, what this statement
is actually saying is that our mortal and perishable
physical body is encompassed with an imperishable
and immortal soul. This is what The Kolbrin
teaches and will be examined further shortly.
It seems that
whenever the compilers of the Bible were given the
information pertaining to the immortality of the
soul, they intentionally found ways of disregarding
it or twisting it around to suit their incessant
focus on the physical resurrection of the body.
Like the handling of the Greek information, the
Biblical influences from another religion called
Zoroastrianism were not spared from such creative
editing techniques.
It can be argued
that both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible
have significant concepts within them that were
heavily influenced by Zoroastrianism. The
fundamental basis of Zoroastrianism lies in the
familiar philosophies of the soul ascending to
heaven upon death where it is judged on its deeds in
this world and ideally spends the rest of eternity
in paradise. The lesser component of this religion
is its doctrine of a future resurrection in a time
similar to those foretold in the Biblical
revelations. I am not implying that resurrection is
a lesser belief in terms of quality, but rather the
quantity of its focus in this religion. Once again,
the compilers of the Bible decided to ignore the
most fundamental concept of this religion, and adopt
the resurrection focus.
There are many in
the western world that have only known the Biblical
teachings, and may not be aware of the nature of the
soul as defined by the rest of the world’s
religions. The creed of The Kolbrin focuses
squarely on the soul and provides excellent
information into what souls are, their purpose, and
their ultimate destiny.
Nature of the Soul
The Kolbrin
defines the soul as part of a multilevel spiritual
structure and the metaphoric description commonly
used is that of a droplet of water from a large
ocean.
The Kolbrin,
P375
My friends, I am
asked, “What is the soulseed and whence does it
come?” Above all is The Supreme Spirit surrounded
by the soulsea, below which is spirit and lower
still matter. The soulseed is a drop from the
soulsea which has been separated out and become
encased in a shell of spirit. What flesh is to the
soulspirit so is spirit to the soulseed.
When not incarnated
with a body, souls are swept along with the tides of
this ocean of souls, destined to be drawn back to
the source where it can rejoice in completeness.
The
Kolbrin,
P79
“I am drawn, by the law of spiritual
gravitation, towards union with the Universal Soul
and can no more escape return there than the mortal
elements of man can escape their return to dust.”
78 “Before time I
was an unconscious spirit potential united with the
Supreme All. Ever since time began I was in the
slumbering sea of spirit, waiting to be drawn forth
into separate mortal incarnation.
The multilevel
concept of clothing the soul is somewhat similar to
the teachings within the great Jewish mysticism
classic, The Zohar.
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic.
Our view is that this topic should never be introduced to others, until they demonstrate a geniune interest.
Nonetheless, those with a genuine interest in the topic will feel a natural urge to share their concerns about a possible threat to themselves and those close to them. Consequently, the most common questions they ask are, "where is Planet X, and what is the most likely worst case scenario?" GO
The Big Six Man-Made Catastrophic Scenarios for 2012 and Beyond — Survival Author Matthew Stein and Jacco van der Worp MSc
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements.
Taken altogether, it is a bizarre twist on the Biblical story of Noah and the Flood — and with strikingly similar themes.
For those new to the topic of 2012, the film is great entertainment, but it also drives home an ancient failing of humanity. That the common folk are often the last to know, whether by their own choices or those made for them by wealthy and powerful elites. Ergo, many will never ask, "where will I be in 2012?" They'll just have enough time to ask, "My God, what's happening?" GO
The
Sagan Continuation Project:We
WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help
us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply,
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic. 
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements. 
It was eventually
noticed that during sleep, the dream world seemed as
real as being awake, and that it was even possible
to wake up and remember the journeys of the night in
great detail. However, even though the body had the
same appearance at death, the person would not wake
up to tell the amazing stories of their journey. It
is through such observations that early humans
eventually derived the notion of a soul which
experienced the dream world and lived on after
death.
